MANUFACTURING CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH

What 1,625 Security Findings Reveal About Manufacturing Cyber Risk

What original research reveals about where manufacturing cyber risk concentrates — and the six areas leaders should prioritize.

21

Assessments

7

Risk Categories

1,625

Identified Issues

6

Risk Stories

WHAT THE RESEARCH SHOWS

Manufacturing risk is interconnected.

Cybersecurity weaknesses rarely exist in isolation. In manufacturing, issues like identity gaps, outdated systems, remote connectivity, third-party access and incomplete recovery planning can compound in ways that increase operational exposure. 

1

Identity

Shared accounts, inconsistent MFA, and excessive access.

2

Patching

Unsupported systems and persistent vulnerability exposure.

3

Encryption

Reduce the likelihood that security incidents interrupt plant operations.

4

Exposure

Vendor connectivity and remote maintenance without enough control.

5

Remote Access

Reduce exposure from outdated systems and delayed security updates.

6

Security Visibility

Understanding where your environment is mature and where to focus next.

WHAT THE RESEARCH SHOWS

Manufacturing risk is interconnected.

Cybersecurity weaknesses rarely exist in isolation. In manufacturing, issues like identity gaps, outdated systems, remote connectivity, third-party access and incomplete recovery planning can compound in ways that increase operational exposure. 

1

Identity

Shared accounts, inconsistent MFA, and excessive access.

2

Patching

Unsupported systems and persistent vulnerability exposure.

3

Encryption

Reduce the likelihood that security incidents interrupt plant operations.

4

Exposure

Vendor connectivity and remote maintenance without enough control.

5

Remote Access

Reduce exposure from outdated systems and delayed security updates.

6

Security Visibility

Understanding where your environment is mature and where to focus next.

ABOUT THE RESEARCH

Built from real-world manufacturing assessments.

This original research originated from 1,625 anonymized risk findings identified through cybersecurity assessments across 21 unique manufacturing environments between 2023 and 2026. 

SOURCE

Findings come from cybersecurity assessments performed by Accent Consulting across more than 20 real-world manufacturing organizations.

SCOPE

Assessments evaluated security conditions across 7 distinct categories, including: identity & access, patching, encryption and select exposure types.

ANALYSIS

Individual findings were aggregated and categorized to identify recurring patterns, concentrations of risk and issues shared across enviroments.

PRIVACY

Company-specific information was anonymized. This research focuses on aggregated patterns of risk and exposure, not specific manufacturers.

HOW TO USE THIS HUB

Turn the research into a practical next step.

Identify

Find the risk areas most relevant to your manufacturing environment.

Review

Read the related insights and explore common oversight patterns.

Explore

Use supporting resources to understand prevention and solution options.

Prioritize

Choose the actions that reduce the most meaningful risk for your team.

HOW TO USE THIS HUB

Turn the research into a practical next step.

Use this hub as your starting point. Begin with the risks that matter most to your manufacturing environment, then explore the related guidance, tools and resources to help you  prioritize next steps.

Identify Risks

Find the risk areas most relevant to your environment.

Review Stories

Read the related risk advice and common patterns.

Explore Resources

Use supporting resources to understand your options.

Prioritize Action

Choose the actions that reduce the most meaningful risk.

THE RISK LANDSCAPE

What Are the Biggest Cybersecurity Challenges for Manufacturers?

Manufacturing environments often combine legacy infrastructure, hard-to-interrupt production processes, remote vendor dependencies and uneven visibility across systems. These conditions can make it harder to apply controls consistently, respond quickly and reduce preventable exposure.

The 6 Core Cyber Risk Stories

We break manufacturing cyber risk into six focused narratives. Each one highlights what we found, why it matters and the practical next steps you can take to reduce risk in your environment.

manufacturing graphics (500 x 300 px) (7)

The Identity Crisis

Shared credentials and inconsistent access controls can make compromise easier. Review privileged access, passwords, MFA and account lifecycle controls regularly.

manufacturing graphics (500 x 300 px) (6)

The Patch Gap

Inconsistent patching can leave known vulnerabilities unnecessarily exposed. Prioritize critical assets, document exceptions and formalize review cycles consistently.

manufacturing graphics (500 x 300 px) (8)

The Encryption Gap

Sensitive data is not always protected consistently across environments. Review data classification, encryption coverage and key management practices thoroughly.

manufacturing graphics (500 x 300 px) (9)

The Open Door

Exposed services can create avoidable external entry points. Reduce unnecessary exposure, review firewall rules and strengthen network segmentation controls.

manufacturing graphics (500 x 300 px) (2)

The Remote Risk

Poorly governed remote access can expand external attack paths. Audit vendor access, enforce MFA and apply least-privilege policies consistently across all connections.

manufacturing graphics (500 x 300 px) (4)

The Cloud Trust Problem

Microsoft 365 weaknesses can create trusted access paths into sensitive business data and workflows. Review authentication, admin roles and high-risk accounts to strengthen cloud security.

WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE

Higher-Maturity Manufacturers Do Things Differently.

Higher-maturity manufacturers reduce risk by applying cybersecurity controls more consistently across systems, reviewing access more regularly, improving visibility into assets, vulnerabilities and strengthening recovery readiness.

WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE

Higher-Maturity Manufacturers Do Things Differently.

Higher-maturity manufacturers reduce risk by applying cybersecurity controls more consistently across systems, reviewing access more regularly, improving visibility into assets and vulnerabilities, and strengthening recovery readiness.

QUESTIONS LEADERS ARE ASKING

Common Manufacturing Cybersecurity Questions

What cybersecurity practices matter most for manufacturers?

Manufacturers should prioritize identity controls, patch management, remote access governance, encryption, asset visibility, network segmentation, and tested recovery capabilities. These controls address many of the recurring risks seen across real-world environments.

Ransomware can interrupt production, impact operational continuity, delay fulfillment, and create recovery pressure across both IT and connected operational environments.

Start with risks that most affect uptime, remote access, identity, and recovery readiness. Then use assessment data and environment-specific constraints to build a phased roadmap.

Because manufacturing leaders are usually trying to answer practical business questions, not just review technical issues. A question-based structure makes the content easier to navigate and helps connect risk findings to decision-making.

Manufacturers improve resilience by reducing preventable exposure, standardizing controls, increasing visibility, and testing recovery processes regularly.

READY FOR THE NEXT STEP?

Turn these insights into an actionable roadmap.

Use the risk stories priorities — or work with a manufacturing cybersecurity specialist to evaluate your environment.

QUESTIONS LEADERS ARE ASKING

Common Manufacturing Cybersecurity Questions

What cybersecurity practices matter most for manufacturers?

Manufacturers should prioritize identity controls, patch management, remote access governance, encryption, asset visibility, network segmentation, and tested recovery capabilities. These controls address many of the recurring risks seen across real-world environments.

Ransomware can interrupt production, impact operational continuity, delay fulfillment, and create recovery pressure across both IT and connected operational environments.

Start with risks that most affect uptime, remote access, identity, and recovery readiness. Then use assessment data and environment-specific constraints to build a phased roadmap.

Because manufacturing leaders are usually trying to answer practical business questions, not just review technical issues. A question-based structure makes the content easier to navigate and helps connect risk findings to decision-making.

Manufacturers improve resilience by reducing preventable exposure, standardizing controls, increasing visibility, and testing recovery processes regularly.

READY FOR THE NEXT STEP?

Turn these insights into an actionable roadmap.

Use the risk stories priorities — or work with a manufacturing cybersecurity specialist to evaluate your environment.